World search for ways to properly manage rural and urban waste generated on daily basis from domestic and industrial buildings, perhaps leads to the adoption of the anaerobic digestion (AD) systems. The system utilizes microorganisms such as viruses, fungi, helminths, bacteria and protozoa to degrade waste so as to generate useful by-products such as biogas, used in heating, lighting and as fuel. Research on ways to effectively generate biogas from different feedstock had been serious in recent years, especially the study of the process kinetics to maximize production. This review seeks to provide details on feedstock type, pretreatment, substrate degradation, biogas properties, biogas utilization and factors influencing its production. Conclusion is drawn, noting that maximum biogas yield can only be obtained if the production parameters are carefully selected. Pressure being among the factors affecting the microclimate of digesters, is often uncontrolled in most biogas production facilities being slightly above the atmospheric pressure. Recent findings shows that biogas/methane amounts is increased with decreased internal gas pressure and could be a new efficient and effective process control strategy together with pH and temperature. This work will equip researchers and biogas plant developers with the rudiments of the technology which will eliminate the lack of technological know-how often experienced in some realms; in order to breach the gap in production and create a balance between waste generation, recycle and reuse.

1. O. S. Joshua et al., “Fundamental principles of biogas product,” International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research (IJSER), vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 47–50, 2014.
2. S. Harirchi et al., “Microbiological insights into anaerobic digestion for biogas, hydrogen or volatile fatty acids (VFAs): A review,” Bioengineered, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 6521–6557, 2022, doi:10.1080/21655979.2022.2035986.
3. I. Toure et al., “Design and realization of digital console for monitoring temperature and humidity in a biodigester,” International Advance Journal of Engineering Research (IAJER), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2022.
4. M. R. Atelge et al., “Biogas production from organic waste: Recent progress and perspectives,” Waste and Biomass Valorization, vol. 11, pp. 1–22, 2018, doi:10.1007/s12649-018-00546-0.
5. M. M. Ali et al., “Mapping of biogas production potential from livestock manures and slaughterhouse waste: A case study for African countries,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 256, no. 120499, pp. 1–18, 2020, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120499.
6. T. M. Thompson, B. R. Young, S. Baroutian, “Advances in the pretreatment of brown macroalgae for biogas production,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 195, no. 106151, pp. 1–12, 2019, doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106151.
7. S. Alexopoulos, Biogas systems: Basics, biogas multifunction, principle of fermentation and hybrid application with a solar tower for the treatment of waste animal manure, vol. 5, no. 4, (Kavala Institute of Technology, 2012).
8. O. Norouzi, A. Dutta, “The current status and future potential of biogas production from Canada’s organic fraction municipal solid waste,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 475, pp. 1–17, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020475.
9. M. Talevi et al., “Speaking from experience: Preferences for cooking with biogas in rural India,” Energy Economics, vol. 107, no. 105796, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105796.
10. V. P. Aravani et al., “Agricultural and livestock sector’s residues in Greece & China: Comparative qualitative and quantitative characterisation for assessing their potential for biogas production,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 154, no. 111821, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111821.
11. O. Kucher et al., “Energy potential of biogas production in Ukraine,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1–22, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/en15051710.
12. T. S. Nam et al., Lab-scale biogas production from co-digestion of super-intensive shrimp sludge and potential biomass feedstocks, vol. 6, no. 1, (2022).
13. I. Syofii, D. P. Sari, “Production of biogas based on human fesses as an alternative energy for remote areas application,” Indonesian Journal of Engineering and Science, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.51630/ijes.v3.i1.29.
14. P. Mukumba et al., “A possible design and justification for a biogas plant at Nyazura Adventist High School, Rusape, Zimbabwe,” Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 12–21, 2013.
15. L. Ioannou-ttofa et al., “Life cycle assessment of household biogas production in Egypt: Influence of digester volume, biogas leakages, and digestate valorization as biofertilizer,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 286, no. 125468, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125468.
16. E. W. Gabisa, S. H. Gheewala, “Potential, environmental, and socio-economic assessment of biogas production in Ethiopia: The case of Amhara regional state,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 122, pp. 446–456, 2019, doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.02.003.
17. H. Gebretsadik, S. Mulaw, G. Gebregziabher, “Qualitative and quantitative feasibility of biogas production from kitchen waste,” American Journal of Energy Engineering, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2018, doi:10.11648/j.ajee.20180601.11.
18. A. M. Abubakar, “Biodigester and feedstock type: Characteristic, selection, and global biogas production,” Journal of Engineering Research and Sciences (JENRS), vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 170–187, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/TBA.
19. S. Gençoğlu, M. S. Bilgili, “Management of liquid digestate in biogas plants,” 9th Global Conference on Environmental Studies (CENVISU-2021) Antalya, Turkey, no. 14, pp. 51–62, 2021.
20. Mohamed Samer, “Biogas plant constructions,” in Biogas, (Cairo, Egypt: , 2012), 344–368, doi:10.5772/31887.
21. A. Wu et al., “A spreadsheet calculator for estimating biogas production and economic measures for UK-based farm-fed anaerobic digesters,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 220, pp. 479–489, 2016, doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.103.
22. K. Rajendran et al., “A novel process simulation model (PSM) for anaerobic digestion using Aspen Plus,” Bioresource Technology, 2014.
23. J. A. Arzate, “Modeling and simulation of biogas production based on anaerobic digestion of energy crops and manure,” (Technischen Universitat Berlin, Berlin, 2019).
24. H. T. T. Nong et al., “Development of sustainable approaches for converting the agro-weeds Ludwigia hyssopifolia to biogas production,” Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, pp. 1–9, 2020, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01083-4.
25. O. Khayal, “Main types and applications of biogas plants,” Nile Valley University, pp. 1–11, 2019, doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.32559.69287.
26. R. Jyothilakshmi, S. V Prakash, “Design, fabrication and experimentation of a small scale anaerobic biodigester for domestic biodegradable solid waste with energy recovery and sizing calculations,” Procedia Environmental Sciences, vol. 35, pp. 749–755, 2016, doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.085.
27.  IRENA, “Measuring small-scale biogas capacity and production.” Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2016.
28. M. A. Fahriansyah, Sriharti, “Design of conventional mixer for biogas digester,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, pp. 1–8, 2019, doi:10.1088/1755-1315/277/1/012017.
29. Z. Lenkiewicz, M. Webster, “How to convert organic waste into biogas: A step-by-step guide.” wasteaid.org.uk/toolkit . (accessed: 14-Aug-2021).
30. M. M. Jaffar, A. M. Rehman, “Wheat straw optimization via its efficient pretreatment for improved biogas production,” Civil Engineering Journal, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1056–1063, 2020, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091528.
31. D. Elalami et al., “Pretreatment and co-digestion of wastewater sludge for biogas production: Recent research advances and trends,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 114, no. 109287, pp. 1–23, 2019, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109287.
32. T. Chowdhury et al., “Latest advancements on livestock waste management and biogas production: Bangladesh’s perspective,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 272, no. 122818, pp. 1–20, 2020, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122818.
33. Y. Lahlou, Design of a biogas pilot unit for Al Akhawayn University (School of Science and Engineering, 2017).
34. B. Bharathiraja et al., “Biogas production – A review on composition, fuel properties, feed stock and principles of anaerobic digestion,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 90, pp. 570–582, 2018, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.093.
35. EIA, “Biomass explained.” www.eia.gov-energyexplained-biomass-landfill-gas-and-biogas-php . (accessed: 14-Aug-2021).
36. P. M. Njeru, P. Njogu, “Conversion of water hyacinth derived biogas to biomethane for electricity generation in Kenya: A waste to energy (WtE) approach,” Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Sustainable Research and Innovation, vol. 5, pp. 79–81, 2014.
37. 37 Fuchs et al., “Tackling ammonia inhibition for efficient biogas production from chicken manure: Status and technical trends in Europe and China,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 97, pp. 186–199, 2018, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.038.
38. A. Neshat et al., “Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manures and lignocellulosic residues as a potent approach for sustainable biogas production,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 79, pp. 308–322, 2017, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.137.
39. M. M. Esteves et al., “Life cycle assessment of manure biogas production: A review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 219, pp. 411–423, 2019, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.091.
40. 40 V Yentekakis, G. Goula, “Biogas management: Advanced utilization for production of renewable energy and added-value chemicals,” Frontiers in Environmental Science, vol. 5, pp. 1–16, 2017, doi:10.3389/fenvs.2017.00007.
41. L. Granado et al., “Technology overview of biogas production in anaerobic digestion plants: A European evaluation of research and development,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 80, pp. 44–53, 2017, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.079.
42. 42 A. Raja, S. Wazir, “Biogas production: The fundamental processes,” Universal Journal of Engineering Science, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 29–37, 2017, doi:10.13189/ujes.2017.050202.
43. 43 HomeBioGas, “What is Biogas? A Beginner’s Guide.” www.homebiogas.com/what-is-biogas-a-beginners-guide- . (accessed: 13-Aug-2021).
44. 44 Parsaee et al., “A review of biogas production from sugarcane vinasse,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 122, pp. 117–125, 2019, doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.01.034.
45. 45 M. A. Abuabdou et al., “A review of anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) for the treatment of highly contaminated land fill leachate and biogas production: Effectiveness, limitations and future perspectives,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 255, no. 120215, pp. 1–12, 2020, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120215.
46. Stürmer et al., “Agricultural biogas production: A regional comparison of technical parameters,” Renewable Energy, vol. 164, pp. 171–182, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.074.
47. A. Abd, M. R. Othman, “Biogas upgrading to fuel grade methane using pressure swing adsorption: Parametric sensitivity analysis on an industrial scale,” Fuel, vol. 308, no. 121986, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121986.
48. Aryal et al., “Microbial electrochemical approaches of carbon dioxide utilization for biogas upgrading,” Chemosphere, vol. 291, no. 132843, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132843.
49. Yuan et al., “A review on biogas upgrading in anaerobic digestion systems treating organic solids and wastewaters via biogas recirculation,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 344, no. 126412, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126412.
50. Jung et al., “Upgrading biogas into syngas through dry reforming,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 143, no. 110949, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110949.
51. A. Westenbroek, J. I. Martin, “Anaerobic digesters and biogas safety.” https://farm-energy.extension.org/anaerobic-digesters-and-biogas-safety/ . (accessed: 11-Mar-2021).
52. K. Sheryazov et al., “Study of the parameters of biogas plants,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, DAICRA 2021, vol. 949, no. 012108, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi:10.1088/1755-1315/949/1/012108.
53. F. I. Al Imam et al., “Development of biogas processing from cow dung, poultry waste, and water hyacinth,” International Journal of Natural and Applied Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 13–17, 2013.
54. Oxfam, “Design, construction and maintenance of a biogas generator.” Oxfam Technical Briefs, : 1–10, 2015.
55. 55 B. Møller et al., “Agricultural biogas production — Climate and environmental impacts,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 1849, pp. 1–24, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su14031849.
56. Mazurkiewicz, “Energy and economic balance between manure stored and used as a substrate for biogas production,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 413, pp. 1–17, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020413.
57. Ł. Małgorzata, J. Frankowski, “The biogas production potential from silkworm waste,” Waste Management, vol. 79, pp. 564–570, 2018, doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.08.019.
58. M. Abubakar, M. U. Yunus, “Reporting biogas data from various feedstock,” International Journal of Formal Sciences: Current and Future Research Trends (IJFSCFRT), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 23–36, 2021, doi:10.5281/zenodo.6366775.
59. 59 Chaump et al., “Leaching and anaerobic digestion of poultry litter for biogas production and nutrient transformation,” Elsevier, vol. 84, pp. 413–422, 2018, doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.024.
60. 60 J. Patinvoh et al., “Innovative pretreatment strategies for biogas production,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 224, pp. 13–24, 2016, doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.083.
61. 61 L. de C. e Silva et al., “Lab-scale and economic analysis of biogas production from swine manure,” Renewable Energy, vol. 186, pp. 350–365, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.114.
62. 62 Grasselli, T. Gal, J. Szendrei, “Possibilities to establish biogas plants in the Northern Great Plain Region, based on cattle and pig manure,” University of Debrecen, Centre for Agricultural Sciences and Engineering, pp. 85–87, 2008.
63. 63 Aromolaran, M. Sartaj, R. M. Z. Alqaralleh, “Biogas production from sewage scum through anaerobic co‑digestion: The effect of organic fraction of municipal solid waste and landfill leachate blend addition,” Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, pp. 1–17, 2022, doi:10.1007/s13399-021-02152-y.
64. 64 K. Srivastava, “Advancement in biogas production from the solid waste by optimizing the anaerobic digestion,” Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 85–103, 2020, doi:10.1007/s42768-020-00036-x.
65. 65 Wongarmat et al., “Anaerobic co-digestion of biogas effluent and sugarcane filter cake for methane production,” Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, vol. 12, pp. 901–912, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01305-3.
66. 66 Achinas, G. J. W. Euverink, “Elevated biogas production from the anaerobic co-digestion of farmhouse waste: Insight into the process performance and kinetics,” Waste Management & Research, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1240–1249, 2019, doi:10.1177/0734242X19873383.
67. 67 Zhang, K. Loh, J. Zhang, “Enhanced biogas production from anaerobic digestion of solid organic wastes: Current status and prospects,” Bioresource Technology Reports, vol. 5, pp. 280–296, 2019, doi:10.1016/j.biteb.2018.07.005.
68. 68 K. Pramanik et al., “The anaerobic digestion process of biogas production from food waste: Prospects and constraints,” Bioresource Technology Reports, vol. 8, pp. 1–38, 2019, doi:10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100310.
69. 69 Mirmohamadsadeghi et al., “Biogas production from food wastes: A review on recent developments and future perspectives,” Bioresource Technology Reports, vol. 7, no. 100202, pp. 1–37, 2019, doi:10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100202.
70. 70 Brémond et al., “Biological pretreatments of biomass for improving biogas production: An overview from lab scale to full-scale,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 90, pp. 583–604, 2018, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.103.
71. 71 Sivaprakash et al., “Analysis of bio-gas from kitchen waste,” International Conference on Advances in Materials, Computing and Communication Technologies 2385, vol. 090001, no. January, pp. 1–7, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0070710 Published.
72. 72 Kaya, M. Bİlgİn, “Biogas production from potato peel,” Acta Biologica Turcica, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2022.
73. 73 Sahu et al., “Evaluation of biogas production potential of kitchen waste in the presence of spices,” Waste Management, vol. 70, pp. 236–246, 2017, doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.045.
74. 74 M. El-Dalatony et al., “Pig‑ and vegetable-cooked waste oils as feedstock for biodiesel, biogas, and biopolymer production,” Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi:10.1007/s13399-021-02281-4.
75. 75 Jupesta, “Using biogas from palm oil residues to enhance energy access in Indonesia,” International Association for Energy Economics, pp. 33–35, 2015.
76. 76 C. Ortega-bravo et al., “Biogas production from concentrated municipal sewage by forward osmosis, micro and ultrafiltration,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 2629, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052629.
77. 77 C. Caruso et al., “Recent updates on the use of agro-food waste for biogas production,” Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1–29, 2019, doi:10.3390/app9061217.
78. 78 F. Al Ajlouni, M. Khattab, “Biogas and compost generated from organic waste at Al-Akaider landfill in Jordan,” Journal of Advanced Sciences and Engineering Technologies (JASET), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 8–22, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.32441/jaset.05.01.02.
79. 79 Ben Oumarou et al., “Statistical modelling of the energy content of municipal solid wastes in Northern Nigeria,” Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment (AZOJETE), vol. 12, pp. 103–109, 2016.
80. 80 B. Oumarou, A. M. Kundiri, M. Dauda, “Material recovery from wastes: An employment and poverty alleviation tool,” Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment (AZOJETE), vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 66–76, 2017.
81. 81 M. Kundiri, B. A. Umdagas, M. B. Oumarou, “Characterization of leachate contaminants from waste dumpsites in Maiduguri, Borno State,” Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment (AZOJETE), vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 140–148, 2017.
82. 82 Priadi et al., “Biogas production in the anaerobic digestion of paper sludge,” 2013 5th International Conference on Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering (ICBEE 2013), vol. 9, pp. 65–69, 2014, doi:10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.01.012.
83. 83 Williams, “The production of bioethanol and biogas from paper sludge,” (Stellenbosch University, 2017).
84. 84 Rodriguez et al., “Mechanical pretreatment of waste paper for biogas production,” Waste Management, vol. 68, pp. 157–164, 2017, doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.040.
85. 85 Patra, “Aquatic weed resources in India and South-East Asia,” International Journal of Current Research (IJCR), vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1343–1345, 2013.
86. 86 N. Ismail et al., “Invasive aquatic plant sciences of Chenderoh Reservoir, Malaysia,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, pp. 1–8, 2019.
87. 87 Winardi Dwi Nugraha, Syafrudin, and Lathifah Laksmi Pradita, “Biogas production from water hyacinth,” in Biogas-Recent advances and integrated approaches, eds Abd El-Fatah Abomohra et al. (InTech Open, 2020), 15, doi:10.5772/intechopen.91396.
88. 88 Kawaroe et al., “Utilization of aquatic weed Salvinia molesta as a raw material for biogas production,” Jurnal Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia (JPHPI), vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 209–217, 2019, doi:https://doi.org/10.17844/jphpi.v22i2.27891.
89. 89 O. Ezama, “Impact of water hyacinth infection in Nigeria inland waters: Utilization and Management,” (The Maritime Commons: Digital Repository of the World Maritime University, Malmo, Sweden, 2019).
90. 90 D. F. Langa, M. P. Hill, S. G. Compton, “Agents sans frontiers: cross-border aquatic weed biological control in the rivers of Southern Mozambique,” African Journal of Aquatic Science, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 329–335, 2020, doi:https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2020.1749551.
91. 91 Arne Jernelov, “Water hyacinths in Africa and Asia,” in The lon-term fate of invasive species, (2017), 117–136, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55396-2_9.
92. 92 Njogu et al., “Biogas production using water hyacinth (Eicchornia crassipes) for electricity generation in Kenya,” Energy and Power Engineering, vol. 7, pp. 209–216, 2015, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/epe.2015.75021.
93. 93 D. Nugraha et al., “Biogas production from water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes): The effect of F/M ratio,” 8th International Conference on Future Environment and Energy (ICFEE 2018), pp. 1–6, 2020, doi:10.1088/1755-1315/150/1/012019.
94. 94 B. Barua, A. S. Kalamdhad, “Water hyacinth to biogas: A review,” Pollution Research Paper, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 491–501, 2016.
95. 95 A. Enaboifo, O. C. Izinyon, “Potential of biogas production from floating aquatic weeds,” Periodical: Advanced Materials Research, vol. 824, pp. 467–472, 2013, doi:https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.824.467.
96. 96 A. Jimin, E. I. Magani, H. I. Usman, “Rainy season identification and species characteristics of aquatic macrophytes in the floodplains of River Benue at Markudi,” Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 145–165, 2014.
97. 97 A. Eyo, “Review of possibilities of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) utilization for biogas production by rural communities in Kainji Lake Basin.” http://hdl.handle.net/1834/18845 . (accessed: 07-Apr-2022).
98. 98 Hussner, “Alien aquatic plant species in European countries,” Weed Research, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 297–306, 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2012.00926.x.
99. 99 Hussner et al., “Management and control methods of invasive alien freshwater aquatic plants: A review,” Aquatic Botany, vol. 136, pp. 112–137, 2017, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j/aquabot/2016/08.002.
100. 100 Bochmann et al., “Anaerobic digestion of pretreated industrial residues and their energetic process integration,” Bioprocess Engineering, vol. 19, pp. 1–11, 2020, doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00487.
101. 101 Rasel et al., “Industrial waste management by sustainable way,” Europa Journal of Engineering and Technology Research (EJ-ENG), vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 111–114, 2019, doi:http://dx.doi/10.24018/ejers.2019.4.4.1225.
102. 102 Semple, R. Hewett, D. Balzano, “Analysis: Europe’s water/wastewater in numbers.” waterworld.com/international/utilities/article/16201111/analysis-europes-waterwastewater-in-numbers . (accessed: 07-Apr-2022).
103. 103 E. Macedo et al., “Global distribution of wastewater treatment plants and their released effluents into rivers and streams,” Earth System Science Data, pp. 1–33, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2021-214.
104. 104 Budiyono et al., “Production of biogas from organic fruit waste in anaerobic digester using ruminant as the inoculum,” MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 156, no. 03053, pp. 1–5, 2018, doi:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815603053.
105. 105 David O Olukanni, Gbemisola I Megbope, and Oluwatosin J Ogundare, “Assessment of biogas generation potential of mixed fruits solid waste,” in Biomethane through resource circularity, 1st ed. , (CRC Press, 2021), 12.
106. 106 M. Alikhan, S. Khoramnejadian, S. M. Khezri, “Vegetable and fruit market wastes as an appropriate source for biogas production via anaerobic digestion process,” Zeitschrift fur Physikalische Chemie, vol. 235, no. 11, pp. 1447–1453, 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/zpch-2020-1723.
107. 107 Aryanto et al., “Utilization of fruit waste as biogas plant feed and its superiority compared to landfill,” International Journal of Technology (IJTech), vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1385–1392, 2017, doi:https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v8i8.739.
108. 108 A. Hammid, N. Aini, R. Selaman, “Anaerobic digestion of fruit wastes for biogas production,” International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education (IJARIIE), vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 34–38, 2019.
109. 109 O. Chinwendu et al., “The potential of biogas production from fruit wastes (watermelon, mango and pawpaw),” World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews (WJARR), vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 52–65, 2019, doi:https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2019.1.3.0026.
110. 110 J. K. Kell, “Anaerobic co-digestion of fruit juice industry wastes with lignocellulosic biomass,” (Stellenbosch University, 2019).
111. Sharda Dhadse and Shanta Satyanarayan, “Role of microbial and organic amendments for the enrichment of methane production in bioreactor,” in Biogas: Basics, integrated approaches, and case studies Working Title, eds Abd El-Fatah Abomohra and El-Sayed Salama (InTech Open, 2022), doi:10.5772/intechopen.102471.
112. 112 Lu et al., “Biogas generation in anaerobic wastewater treatment under tetracycline antibiotic pressure,” Scientific Report, vol. 6, no. 28336, pp. 1–9, 2016, doi:10.1038/srep28336.
113. P. Juanga-Labayen, I. V Labayen, Q. Yuan, “A review on textile recycling practices and challenges,” Textiles, vol. 2, pp. 174–188, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles2010010.
114. Twizerimana et al., “Anaerobic digestion of cotton yarn wastes for biogas production: Feasibility of using sawdust to control digester temperature at room temperature,” Scientific Research, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi:10.4236/oalib.1107654.
115. Opwis, J. S. Gutmann, “Generation of biogas from textile waste waters,” Chemical Engineering Transactions (CEt), vol. 27, pp. 103–108, 2012, doi:10.3303/CET1227018.
116. 116 Kumar, S. Samuchiwal, A. Malik, “Anaerobic digestion of textile industries wastes for biogas production,” Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, vol. 10, pp. 715–724, 2020, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00601-8.
117. Cruz-Salomon et al., “Biogas production from a native beverage vinasse using a modified UASB bioreactor,” Portal Komunikacji Naukowej, vol. 198, pp. 170–174, 2017, doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.11.046.
118. 118 Wickham et al., “Anaerobic digestion of soft drink beverage waste and sewage sludge,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 262, pp. 141–147, 2018.
119. Mirmohamadsadeghi et al., “Pretreatment of lignocelluloses for enhanced biogas production: A review on influencing mechanisms and the importance of microbial diversity,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 135, no. 110173, pp. 1–19, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110173.
120. 120 Kainthola, A. S. Kalamdhad, V. V Goud, “A review on enhanced biogas production from anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass by different enhancement techniques,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 84, pp. 81–90, 2019, doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2019.05.023.
121. Wacławek et al., “Disintegration of wastewater activated sludge (WAS) for improved biogas production,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 21, pp. 1–15, 2019, doi:10.3390/en12010021.
122. Kong et al., “Large pilot-scale submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for the treatment of municipal wastewater and biogas production at 25◦C,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 319, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124123.
123. M. M. N. Dehkordi et al., “Investigation of biogas production potential from mechanical separated municipal solid waste as an approach for developing countries (case study: Isfahan-Iran),” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 119, no. 109586, pp. 1–12, 2020, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109586.
124. Banerjee, N. Prasad, S. Selvaraju, “Reactor design for biogas production: A short review,” Journal of Energy and Power Technology (JEPT), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi:10.21926/jept.2201004.
125. 125 O. Olatunji et al., “Modelling the effects of particle size pretreatment method on biogas yield of groundnut shells,” Waste Management & Research (WMR), pp. 1–13, 2022, doi:10.1177/0734242X211073852.
126. 126 Sarto, R. Hildayati, I. Syaichurrozi, “Effect of chemical pretreatment using sulfuric acid on biogas production from water hyacinth and kinetics,” Renewable Energy, vol. 132, pp. 335–350, 2019, doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.121.
127. 127 Abraham et al., “Pretreatment strategies for enhanced biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 301, no. 122725, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122725.
128. 128 Hagos et al., “Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: Progress, challenges and perspectives,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 76, pp. 1485–1496, 2017, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.184.
129. 129 Sarker et al., “A review of the role of critical parameters in the design and operation of biogas production plants,” Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1–38, 2019, doi:10.3390/app9091915.
130. 130 Yu et al., “A review of crop straw pretreatment methods for biogas production by anaerobic digestion in China,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 107, pp. 51–58, 2019, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.020.
131. 131 M. Uche et al., “Design and construction of fixed dome digester for biogas production using cow dung and water hyacinth,” African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 15–25, 2020, doi:10.5897/AJEST2019.2739.
132. 132 H. Chowdhury, “Review on the pre-treatment methods of waste for anaerobic digestion,” The Seu Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering (SEUJEEE), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 46–51, 2022.
133. 133 Liu et al., “Effects of liquid digestate pretreatment on biogas production for anaerobic digestion of wheat straw,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 280, pp. 345–351, 2019, doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.147.
134. 134 Almomani, “Prediction of biogas production from chemically treated co-digested agricultural waste using artificial neural network,” Fuel, vol. 280, no. 118573, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118573.
135. 135 Mancini et al., “Increased biogas production from wheat straw by chemical pretreatments,” Renewable Energy, vol. 119, pp. 608–614, 2018, doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.045.
136. 136 Vinzelj et al., “Employing anaerobic fungi in biogas production: Challenges & opportunities,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 300, no. 122687, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122687.
137. 137 K. Show et al., “Insect gut bacteria: A promising tool for enhanced biogas production,” Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, pp. 1–25, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-021-09607-8.
138. 138 O. Wagner, P. Illmer, “Biological pretreatment strategies for second-generation lignocellulosic resources to enhance biogas production,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 1797, pp. 1–14, 2018, doi:10.3390/en11071797.
139. 139 A. Rajput, C. Visvanathan, “Effect of thermal pretreatment on chemical composition, physical structure and biogas production kinetics of wheat straw,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 221, pp. 45–52, 2018, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.011.
140. Tabatabaei et al., “A comprehensive review on recent biological innovations to improve biogas production, Part 1: Upstream strategies,” Renewable Energy, vol. 146, pp. 1204–1220, 2019, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.037.
141. 141 Raymond, U. Okezie, “The significance of biogas plants in Nigeria’s energy strategy,” Journal of Physical Sciences and Innovation, vol. 3, pp. 11–17, 2011.
142. Guo et al., “Biodegradation of guar gum and its enhancing effect on biogas production from coal,” Fuel, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122606.
143. 143 Pigosso et al., Fundamentals of anaerobic digestion, biogas purification, use and treatment of digestate (Concordia, SC: Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation-Embrapa Swine & Poultry, 2022).
144. K. McCabe, T. Schmidt, Integrated Biogas Systems: Local Applications of Anaerobic Digestion Towards Integrated Sustainable Solutions (Queensland, Australia: IEA Bioenergy, 2018).
145. 145 Singh, Z. Szamosi, Z. Siménfalvi, “Impact of mixing intensity and duration on biogas production in an anaerobic digester: A review,” Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 508–521, 2020, doi:10.1080/07388551.2020.1731413.
146. P. C. Bong et al., “The characterisation and treatment of food waste for improvement of biogas production during anaerobic digestion– A review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 172, pp. 1545–1558, 2017, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.199.
147. M. Abubakar, M. Alhassan, “History, adverse effect and clean up strategies of oil spillage,” International Journal of Applied Sciences: Current and Future Research Trends (IJASCFRT), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 31–51, 2021, doi:10.5281/zenodo.5557307.
148. V Miroshnichenko, N. V Nikulina, “Designing a biogas plant for an educational and scientific livestock complex,” 8th Scientific and Practical Conference ”Biotechnology: Science and Practice”, pp. 151–163, 2022, doi:10.18502/kls.v7i1.10117.
149. F. S. dos Santos et al., “Assessment of potential biogas production from multiple organic wastes in Brazil: Impact on energy generation, use, and emissions abatement,” Resources, Conservation & Recycling, vol. 131, pp. 54–63, 2018, doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.012.
150. Sawyerr et al., “An overview of biogas production: Fundamentals, applications and future research,” International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 105–116, 2019, doi:10.32479/ijeep.7375.
151. Maroušek et al., “Advances in nutrient management make it possible to accelerate biogas production and thus improve the economy of food waste processing,” Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi:10.1080/15567036.2020.1776796.
152. Tabatabaei et al., “A comprehensive review on recent biological innovations to improve biogas production, Part 2: Mainstream and downstream strategies,” Renewable Energy, vol. 146, pp. 1392–1407, 2019, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.047.
153. 153 Oladejo et al., “Pretreatment and optimization strategy for biogas production from agro-based wastes,” The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES), vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 14–20, 2022, doi:10.9790/1813-1103011420.
154. Venturin et al., “Effect of pretreatments on corn stalk chemical properties for biogas production purposes,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 266, pp. 1–36, 2018, doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.069.
155. Khalil et al., “Waste to energy technology: The potential of sustainable biogas production from animal waste in Indonesia,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 105, pp. 323–331, 2019, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.011.
156. Schiaroli et al., “Catalytic upgrading of clean biogas to synthesis gas,” Catalysts, vol. 12, no. 109, pp. 1–28, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12020109.
157. Z. Abdul, A. M. Abubakar, “Potential swing to natural gas-powered electricity generation,” International Journal of Natural Sciences: Current and Future Research Trends (IJNSCFRT), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2021.
158. 158 Rafiee et al., “Biogas as an energy vector,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 144, no. 105935, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105935.
159. Nsair et al., “Operational parameters of biogas plants: A review and evaluation study,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 15, pp. 1–27, 2020, doi:10.3390/en13153761.
160. 160 Maroušek et al., “Advances in the agrochemical utilization of fermentation residues reduce the cost of purpose-grown phytomass for biogas production,” Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, pp. 1–11, 2020, doi:10.1080/15567036.2020.1738597.
161. N. Usman, M. A. Suleiman, M. I. Binni, Anaerobic digestion of agricultural wastes: A potential remedy for energy shortfalls in Nigeria, vol. 4, no. 1, (Scholarena, 2021).
162. Bakraoui et al., “Biogas production from recycled paper mill wastewater by UASB digester: Optimal and mesophilic conditions,” Biotechnology Reports, vol. 25, pp. 1–8, 2020, doi:10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00402.
163. O. Cinar et al., “Long-term assessment of temperature management in an industrial scale biogas plant,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 612, pp. 1–17, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020612.
164. H. Bhatt, L. Tao, “Economic perspectives of biogas production via anaerobic digestion,” Bioengineering, vol. 7, no. 74, pp. 1–19, 2020, doi:10.3390/bioengineering7030074.
165. R. I. Utami et al., “Analysis of the effect of internal gas pressure of an anaerobic digester on biogas productivity of a mixture of cow dung and tofu liquid waste,” The 9th National Physics Seminar-AIP onference Proceedings 2320, vol. 2320, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0037446.
166. R. Prajapati, R. K. Sharma, I. M. Amatya, “Effect of reduced gas pressure on yield of biogas and other physicochemical parameters,” International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, vol. 12, pp. 31–37, 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-020-00351-3.
167. M. W. Harnadek, N. G. H. Guilford, E. A. Edwards, “Chemical oxygen demand analysis of anaerobic digester contents,” STEM Fellowship Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2015, doi:10,17975/sfj-2015-008.
168. 168 Y. Choong, K. W. Chou, I. Norli, “Strategies for improving biogas production of palm oil mill effluent (POME) anaerobic digestion: A critical review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 82, pp. 2993–3006, 2018, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.036.
169. V. Kumar et al., “A review on production of biogas, fundamentals, applications and its recent enhancing techniques,” Elixir International Journal, vol. 57, pp. 14073–14079, 2013.
170. Khadka et al., “Effect of the substrate to inoculum ratios on the kinetics of biogas production during the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 834, pp. 1–16, 2022, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030834.
171. Ghiandelli, “Development and implementation of small-scale biogas balloon biodigester in Bali, Indonesia,” (KTH School of Industrial Engineering and Management, 2017).
172. Mishra et al., “Multidimensional approaches of biogas production and up-gradation: Opportunities and challenges,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 338, no. 125514, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125514.

Citations by Dimensions

Citations by PlumX

Crossref Citations

1. KeChrist Obileke, Stephen Tangwe, Golden Makaka, Patrick Mukumba, “Comparison of prediction of biogas yield in a batch mode underground fixed dome digester with cow dung.” Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, vol. , no. , pp. , 2023.
2. N Faizin, Z Ulma, R E Rachmanita, M J Wibowo, S Anwar, “Optimizing the ratio of raw materials and pH on biogas production from cow manure with banana peel waste in batch system reactors.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1338, no. 1, pp. 012061, 2024.
3. Shakir Ali, Isha, Young-Cheol Chang, “Ecotoxicological Impact of Bioplastics Biodegradation: A Comprehensive Review.” Processes, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 3445, 2023.

No. of Downloads per Month

No. of Downloads per Country